Monday, July 7, 2008

In Bruges (2008)

Photobucket

Full disclosure: I’ve always disliked Colin Farrell. His resume is filled with bad movies, and when he somehow ends up in a good film he’s usually the worst part in it. However, this film has changed my outlook completely. Colin Farrell is so astonishingly good, so impeccably cast, that I actually look forward to the next Colin Farrell film. Martin McDonagh’s In Bruges is just that good.

Ken (Brendan Gleeson) and Ray (Farrell) are both hit men. I’m pretty sure that this is an occupation that only exists in the movies, but whatever. What makes them different from most hit men, however, is the fact that they seem like fairly ordinary people--kind of like Jules and Vincent in Pulp Fiction, rather than the elite killers found in such films as Assassins. Ray, especially, acts like you think a criminal actually might act. It’s rather refreshing.

Photobucket

Having finished their last job, their boss, Harry Waters (Ralph Fiennes) sends them--sentences them, if you will--to Bruges, a medieval town in Belgium. Ken, the older of the two, is able to make the best out of it, and turns it into a site-seeing trip. Ray, on the other hand, thinks Bruges is purgatory.

Ray is a real shit. He acts somewhat like a child with ADD, and, as I said, it’s Farrell’s best performance. I hesitate to suggest that this might be because Farrell is more like Ray than, say, Alexander the Great. But who knows. In Bruges, he finds only two things that interest him--the chance for sex (which he finds with Chloe, a native of the area) and gawking at a dwarf who’s in town for a film (“They’re filming midgets!” Ray says). When he isn’t around Chloe or Jimmy (the midget), he’s generally pouting or getting himself into trouble. We do learn, however, that there is a reason for his attitude--everything did not go smoothly during Ray’s last mission, and his conscience weighs heavily on him. His petulant attitude, perhaps, disguises the turmoil inside.

Photobucket

Farrel isn't the only great character, though. Brendan Gleeson is always reliable, and plays Ray's grown-up partner with just the right amount of seriousness, while Ralph Fiennes (seemingly on a break from dour period pieces) is suitably intimidating and brutish as their boss, Harry.

Most of the humour in In Bruges comes from Ray, and hits its mark. There’s a great scene--unfortunately spoiled in the trailer--where he tries to tell some obese American tourists that they should avoid the narrow, winding stairs that lead to the top of the medieval church. His lack of subtlety (and the Americans’ lack of good sense) lead to an altercation that should make anyone laugh heartily (except, perhaps, uptight and overweight Americans). All of the humour makes the graphic violence near the end of the film all the more shocking.

Photobucket

In Bruges isn’t without its flaws, though. The ending is a little too perfect, and sometimes that humour falls flat. When going for laughs, McDonagh’s film swings for the fences, and so when it misses, the silence is deafening. While Ray’s obsession with midgets, for instance, is humorous, said midget’s obsession with an oncoming racial war seems tacked on, like McDonagh needed something zany to add to fill space, and it was the best he could come up with.

The Focus Features DVD presents In Bruges in its original 2.35:1 aspect ratio, and comes with a few featurettes. Most notably among these is “Fucking Bruges,” a compilation of all the swears in the film. This is good for a quick chuckle, and also draws attention to the fact that In Bruges must be one of the most expletive-filled films out there. I’d highly recommend checking it out.

5 comments:

Hollinger. said...

WE'RE IN FUCKIN BELGIUM!

Doug Tilley said...

How would you rank it in terms of films you've seen this year? I've heard some critics pimp it as one of the best, but I don't want to go into it expecting too much.

Any films you would compare it to?

Ash said...

It's better than most films from this year, that I can think of. Admittedly I haven't seen that many, though, and being better than WANTED isn't much of an accomplishment. It's worth checking out.

Not sure what to compare it to, really. I guess early Guy Ritchie, or KISS KISS BANG BANG, but it's far more sedate than any of those. More low key.

Hollinger. said...

It is at the top of my list right now, but it has not been much of a year so far...

1. In Bruges
2. Iron Man
3. Be Kind Rewind
4. Forgetting Sarah Marshall
5. Doomsday
6. The Incredible Hulk
7. Cloverfield
8. Charlie Bartlett
9. Diary Of The Dead
10. Funny Games
11. The Ruins
12. The Strangers
13. Rambo
14. Wanted
15. 21
16. Indiana Jones & The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull

Full disclose, stuff I still need to see:
Vantage Point
The Bank Job
Street Kings
Stop Loss
The Signal
Kung Fu Panda
Get Smart
Wall-E

Hollinger. said...

Did you see You Kill Me? It's kinda similar in tone to that. I dunno what else to compare it to. Maybe Woody Allen directing a Guy Ritchie movie?